#Adobe lightroom support how to#
#Adobe lightroom support software#

If I've added metadata, rated, flagged, cropped, adjusted color, etc. And this is the crux of why true support in Lightroom is needed. For either scenario above, working in true RAW+ JPEG pairs means that I can switch the version that I'm working with and not lose anything.This way the client sees close to what they willВ get. Have you ever tried to tell a client to to вЂњenvision this in B&WвЂќ? Exactly. If I'm working with a client looking over my shoulder, or doing a quick in-studio review of the images (shooting tethered or capturing later), having them see the JPEG on-screen (on camera or on the computer) means they are seeing an image closer to the look that I intended.

If however I decide that I need to treat the image more, I can swap to the RAW file and startВ over. Whether we're talking about vacation photos that I don't want to spend a bunch of time processing, or client photos that I want to deliver quickly, if the images look the way I want them to look, then I'm done. If the image comes out of the camera looking the way I want it to, then no (or minimal) post-processing is needed.I'm shooting mirrorless which means I see the image the way it will look through the viewfinder or on the LCD, before I even fire the frame. Whether that's a crunchy, saturated look, a soft muted look, a flat or a hard grainy B&W, the point is I'm making the photos look the way I want to before I even start shooting. I shoot RAW+ JPEG because I like to вЂњpre-processвЂќ my files, meaning I develop a вЂњlookвЂќ for my photos in-camera. We'll start with my personal workflow.Here are a few that come to mind (if you have another reason, leave it in the comments and I'll add it to thisВ list). Conventional wisdom is that RAW is superior to JPEG (technically true) so what's the point of shooting both? There are several reasons. Why shoot RAW+ JPEGВ anyway?ДЇair question. This is for the tech-heads and eventually for Adobe so they know what we're lookingВ for.

Unless you want to know the technicalities of how the workflow worked in Aperture and specifically what I'd love to see in Lightroom, there's no need to read the rest of this long and detailed post. Even if you're not using Lightroom, but see this missing feature as a barrier to your adoption, or a feature you'd use if it was there, pleaseВ comment. I want to gather as many comments as I can, like a petition, to show Adobe that this is a valid feature that Lightroom users (and potentialВ Lightroom users)В want.

#Adobe lightroom support how to#

Of course if you have suggestions on how to make it better, leave those in the comments and I'll add them to thisВ request. And the workflow in Aperture was awesome. Since Aperture is officially dead, I don't think anyone will complain if Adobe completely copies the Aperture features.

#Adobe lightroom support software#

Basically if you shoot RAW+ JPEG, onВ import the software treats the pair as a single photo, where you can add metadata, do adjustments, or anything else you'd do to a photo, then allow you to swap whether you're working with the RAW or the JPEG version at any time - without losing any of your work.В Read the вЂњwhy?вЂќ section below for specific workflow examples.Д¬omment below to вЂњsignвЂќ this petition. RAW+ JPEG support is a workflow that existed in Aperture, but doesn't in Lightroom.В For those who've never had it, it might be hard to understand why anyone would want it. For those in a hurry, here's the вЂњtoo long didn't readвЂќ version.